Showing posts with label Zeena. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zeena. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 5, 2016

Bojan Abraxas Pandža, live at Porno pop, 16.03.2012. (NOFM radio)


Za sve vas koji volite iskren, nezdrav humor, ali ste i može biti radoznali da saznate o nekim marginalnim temama koje se nerado spominju po našim medijima, evo jednog radio intervjua iz marta 2012. koji je sa mnom napravio izvrsni Mihajlo Mihajlo Jovanovic aka Dunduew. Dakle, radi se o kultnoj emisiji "Porno pop" koja je išla petkom na danas pokojnom NOFM radiju, pa ko ima tih živaca da sluša moje čuvene govorne mane i vrline uz dosta zaista kvalitetne muzike po izboru autora i mene, nek mu ga najopuštenije dadne po slušanju, neće se pokajati, ja garantujem. Znači od Cro-Magsa preko Radio Werewolfa i Agnostic Fronta, Laibacha, Jadranke Stojaković i Boyd Rice-a, pa sve do old school sevdalinke, a tu je i par pesama koje sam nažalost bio prinuđen da obrišem zbog nekakvih gistro autorskih prava, tako da ako naletite na 2-3 mute rupčage od po par minuta, mojne to da vas zbuni no samo "premotajte" malo unapred. Eto, aj' pa živeli! :)

- Abraxas Pandža, Vidikovac finest


"Bojan Abraxas Pandža, autor knjige "A znaš li ti jadan da smo mi ođe za okultno zaduženi?" i vlasnik savršeno kontraverznog bloga Abraxas 365, pakleniše sa Dunduew~Oooom na ovaj petak, o dokumentarnom filmu, paklu, ludilu, anarhiji i svim magijskim i paramagijskim pornjavama...tune in!"


Friday, April 1, 2016

Zeena Schreck [Full concert] @Kantine am Berghain Berlin, Feb 28, 2016


Zeena Schreck performing Sonic Ritual Concert at Kantine am Berghain Berlin - February 28, 2016

Playlist:
1. Introduction 0:33
2. Kali Mantra 8:40
3. An Untitled Protest (Country Joe and The Fish, Together 1968) 16:00
4. Sethian Dream Oracle Mantra 22:35
5. Trinity (Radio Werewolf, Songs For The End Of The World 1991) 27:08
6. Amitabha Mantra 40:28

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Zeena Schreck: Radio Werewolf - "Pleasure Dome"


"PLEASURE DOME is the temple of carnal delight first approached through HEIDENTOR. A Hymn to the life-creating power of Eros, restoring the body to its sacred significance. Sex, reconsecrated as a union of eternal forces, sinless and holy."

- Zeena Schreck from the Radio Werewolf Press Release for "Love Conquers All"

Music & Vocals: Zeena
Vocals: Nikolas Schreck

Thursday, November 20, 2014

Kako javlja poludebilni B92 radio...


Pričalo se ovih dana na onom režimskom, a što je još gore ciganskom radiju B92, naširoko o Čičinoj ženidbi. To im valjda bila glavna vest jer od kad im Vučić i zvanično posto gazda sad ne mož se zajebavaju ko nekad no jbga menjaj temu, daj bilo šta, daj nešto preko bare, bilo šta bizarno da se narod zanima. I da me oni ne obavestiše ja ladno evo ne bi ni znao da se Čiča ženi, jer šta ja imam s tim što se tamo neko ženi? Naime, stanoviti voditelji nečega, Daško i Mlađa, upamtio sam te simpatične nadimke, valjda im beše krivo što je jedan čiča od 80 leta sa 50 godina robije na grbači nabacio sebi lepu i mladu, te udariše po časnoj starini sa sviju strana a bez da su uzeli ma iole da se informišu na zadatu temu. Sve novinar istraživač do novinara insajdera, od Ljankice učili zanat. Vele ovi wikipedija doktoranti da je Čiča pored toga što je bio masovni i serijski ubica, bio i silovatelj, navodno je sam tako izjavio u novinama, reko da je biseksualac jer je silovo nekog dečaka pod tušem kao mlad u popravnom domu. OK, ne kažem, jako je moguće da je Čiča to izjavio, jer je za života svašta izjavljivao ali bogami i izvaljivao...ALI isto tako je i Carl Panzram, poznatiji i kao Karlito, narodski rečeno klejmovao da je silovao preko 1000 dečaka i muškaraca. Šta ćemo s tim? I to piše na wikipediji i tako tim poludebilnim šok-ludilo sajtovima. Imamo li dokaza za to? Znači, ako mi novinar ili bilo ko postavi sad neko retardirano pitanje tipa dal' sam ubijao ljude, čerečio ih i jeo, pa naravno da ću mu odgovoriti da sam ih ne samo jeo s apetitom nego sam i preko humanitaraca pola Obrenovca u maju na'ranio donacijama. To bre isto ko ovi debili ovde koji su ladno poverovali da sam zlostavljao svoju sestru jer sam tako napisao na fejsbuku, na tarabi ovde, nadam se samo da sam ih sve pobrisao letos. Kakvog sve naroda u Srbiji ima pa to je strašno, nije ni čudo što nas jebe kako ko stigne. A što se tiče pominjanja Zeene Schreck u istoj toj emisiji o tome zaista ne bih, ma ne usuđujem se jer skroz nemam veze s tim, stoga mora da se ogradim, jer takvo nešto samo hardkor mazohista može da izjavi ko što je taj klipan, da ga ne imenujem, tako da ga loša karma evo već sad lomi. Ma samo nek se seti Jayne Mansfield, ima i o tome na wikipediji.

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

New Interview with Zeena: The Breaking of Taboo and Transgression of Social Norms in Religion and Culture - part 5


UKZN: In regard to Tantric Deities, there is a Deity named Unmatta Bhairava, who is regarded as the mad or crazy form of Bhairava. So I wondered why would a deity be regarded as insane. Is it insane from the perspective of an outsider or someone who is a non-Tantric?

Zeena: There are many reasons why wrathful deities appear the way that they do. First of all they could be local or regional wild pagan deities or demons who were later transformed to become Dharma protector deities but they still retain the frightful appearance they had when they were untamed pagan deities. Even when they've become enlightened and transformed into protector deities, they don’t change their original characteristics. That’s exactly what we have to understand about ourselves when practicing tantra…we have certain characteristics, a personality, we have a particular constitution or temperament, unique ways of being and when we embark on these practices, the point isn’t to turn ourselves into uniformly “nice” appearing people, smiling all the time (unless that happens to be your basic character to begin with). That idea, that to become enlightened you have to develop a totally different character or temperament,...that’s not the way it works actually.

Understanding wrathful deities of this kind are another way of understanding of Samsara and Nirvana as one. Because the wrathful deities - those who have been transformed from previously malignant deities - their character hasn’t changed. They have simply taken that fierce, powerful or forceful quality, that part of their character, and transformed themselves to apply those same qualities, through pure motivation (rather than tainted motivations) toward compassionate ends. So, you see some wrathful deities appear as they do because they've been transformed from formerly malicious deities or demons, yet their character hasn’t changed. They're still fearsome, they're still strong, they're still forceful but they are benevolent at the core.

To give an entirely different example of deities who appear in a wrathful form: It could be that there's one appearance of the deity [yidam], a peaceful appearing version, and then, that same deity is known to have another more wrathful appearance which the practitioner sees and understands in conjunction with his or her own level of spiritual development. The wrathful form of a normally benevolent appearing deity is a form of nakedness, no boundaries, nothing concealed, no fetters or fears. It can also be a way for the yidam to approach similar-appearing but malignant beings to gain their trust enough to show them the benefits of adopting virtuous motives and actions. Or, it could also be that a benevolent bodhisattva or Buddha takes a wrathful form to apply counterforce techniques to disarm a demon's non-virtuous actions while encouraging the demon's strengths and constructive qualities, showing him how to transform his strengths into positive goals. In this way, experiencing both peaceful and wrathful forms (or even multiple forms) of a yidam, bodhisattva or Buddha helps facilitate the practitioner's understanding and experience of non-dualism, impermanence and personal transformation for the purposes of ultimate enlightenment, to help others also reach enlightenment.

So, depending on the experiences and development of the practitioner, he or she might gravitate to more of the wrathful yidams.

On the other hand, there are times, for example, when a practitioner gets a glimpse of a normally benevolent-appearing deity in its wrathful form - or similarly - one's own teacher (who is the embodiment of a particular yidam or Buddha) in a wrathful form. This can be a test of sorts to the student - when a yidam, or a teacher, uncharacteristically appears wrathful. Often, that first glimpse of the wrathful side of a deity, that first experience of an “unpleasant aspect” of a deity or teacher, can be so disconcerting that it's enough to frighten off the weak-willed or uncommitted. This is an example of how the tantric path is the fastest route to realization. Because in order to make rapid progress, a student must overcome fears, judgments and prejudices very quickly. So viewing a wrathful manifestation of a diety, like Bhairava, as “insane” would be an indicator of one's understanding.
_____________

Photo: Guru Dorje Drolö — one of the Eight Manifestations of Guru Rinpoche [Padmasambhava]. Guru Dorje Drolö is the wrathful form of [Padmasambhava] riding upon a pregnant tigress. The first Emperor of Tibet [Trisong Detsen] invited Padmasambhava from the Swat region of Pakistan to subdue malignant demonic forces which caused plagues, epidemics and obstacles to the development of Buddhist teachings in Tibet. The demons were not destroyed, instead Padmasambhava taught them the Dharma which enabled their transformation into generous protectors. This corresponds with the tantric principle of not eliminating negative forces but redirecting them to fuel the journey toward spiritual awakening. Padmasambhava brought Indian tantric pratices to Tibetan Buddhism, which are now practiced as Buddhist tantra [Vajrayāna].

[Note: To dispel popular misconceptions — these practices have nothing to do with black magic, satanism, or malicious sorcery.]

Monday, February 24, 2014

NEW INTERVIEW WITH ZEENA for the Italian Art Forum WSF by Luca Piccolo (February 21, 2014)


Among all of the left hand path personalities emerging in Europe today, most important has been Zeena Schreck whose life’s work is dedicated to raising awareness in the West of the difference between authentic left-way mystical traditions from occult imitations. Much of her research, experiences and teachings in that field are presented in her influential book “Demons of the Flesh: The Complete Guide to Left Hand Path Sex Magic,” co-authored with Nikolas Schreck. Zeena Schreck is an American born, Berlin-based interdisciplinary artist known by the one-name moniker ZEENA. A counter-culture icon, she is known through her work as photographer, graphic artist, musician/composer, writer, animal rights activist, magician and mystic. She has practiced and taught magic and meditation for over 30 years. Her artwork stems from her mystical experience. Since childhood, Zeena was exposed to magic and sorcery through her family environment. In 1990, Zeena renounced the pseudo-satanic religion of her family in favor of finding her way to authentic Eastern left-way spiritual lineages. Today, she is a practicing Tibetan Buddhist yogini and the spiritual leader of the Sethian Liberation Movement (SLM, founded 2002).


Between 1988-1993 Zeena was composer, vocalist, musician and graphic designer for the sonic magical musical project Radio Werewolf (c. 1984 to 1993). Her most recent musical release is “The Vinyl Solution-Analog Artifacts: Ritual Instrumentals and Undercover Versions” Her graphic-art project, “God Bless Charles Manson” is published in “The Manson File: Myth and Reality of an Outlaw Shaman.” Her most recent art installation (Nov. 2013) was “Zeena Schreck, Live From the Eye of the Storm” transmitting sacred syllables from Vajrayana, Shaktism and Sethian-Typhonian left-way tantric practices, organized by visual artist Frank Haines and presented by Performa-13. http://13.performa-arts.org/event/frank-haines-zeena-schreck Zeena has written for VICE Magazine and the Beat-oriented periodical Beatdom and is currently working on music and art projects.

How do you define Art?

There are many different types of art and reasons why people feel driven to create. In my case I use a holistic approach. There has always been an inseparable unity between my spiritual practices and my art. This holistic approach to art, exactly like the tantric techniques I practice, is when all activities and aspects of life are a part of an ongoing “work in progress” contributing to the ultimate completed work – both art and spiritual work. So this informs all activities, whether you're buying art supplies, rehearsing, eating, carrying out your personal grooming, painting, having sex, sleeping, cleaning, wrapping a package, driving, parenting, contemplating, helping a sick friend, singing, etc. – absolutely all aspects of your life are carried out in as mindful a way as possible in order that each small part contributes to the greater body of work, which you eventually shed and leave behind. Your Magnum Opus – this life.

In this sense, I guess you could say I'm an inspired artist, rather than one who's perfecting or developing a particular school or type of art or an artist who's more interested in technical aspects of the craft. Inspired art is literally having the breath of divine or spiritual energies stir within you so that you are no longer your usual persona; the composite of your habits, conditioning, tastes, biases, circumstances, etc.. Instead, you are a medium for the energy which is inspiring (breathing into) you to create. In antiquity, this phenomenon was known as being inspired by a Muse. I was born with this type of inspiration to create. As early as I can remember, I had an impulse to draw and would just sit in the middle of the floor, or on the roof of our house, or blocking the stairwell just to draw. I drew on absolutely anything available in the house – often to the irritation of my parents! I was a drawing maniac. Drawing gave me a whole-body peaceful sensation and I'd get an uneasy feeling of something being “wrong” if I couldn't immediately draw when the impulse struck. I had no idea where that idea came from. Even now I can't adequately articulate it, like a dream you can't fully describe. Much later I learned that in ancient times being born with creative inspiration was considered a gift from the gods. It was thought that if you didn't honor that divine inspiration, or gift, and fulfil your destiny to create, the gods would not look favorably upon you. They considered it a slight against their generosity when humans wasted potential that not everyone's granted. So you'd forfeit your gift and that divine inspiration would be passed on to another more worthy. That's what the phrase “the muse has left” originally meant. That you waited too long and the divine inspiration was permanently taken from you. So maybe as a child I had some kind of karmic “memory” of something similar to this mythological phenomenon.

As a child, I never wanted the usual things kids ask for as gifts; games, toys, dolls or popular clothes. What really got me enthused was getting art supplies and materials, particularly materials to make my own puppets with. Somewhere in storage, I still have a box of my childhood drawings and some paper puppets I made, which are quite humorous considering the influences I was exposed to growing up. I have a newspaper clipping about a junior art competition that I won at six years old. Around the same age I began creating theater pieces and ballet shows with neighborhood friends. Then my grandfather taught me how to use an old camera and I fell in love with photography. By fourteen I began training in drama and theater. I made experimental films with class-mates and wrote monologues and scenes for presentations and showcases. I watched as many foreign films as possible, what Americans considered art house films, and that spawned a growing desire to live and work in the European film industry. And then later I began musical composition. So, the point is, this creative inspiration couldn't be curtailed.

In tantric Buddhist practices there are many factors that determine why a person has predispositions for certain things. So aside from this inspiration to create, there are certain organically recurring themes in much of my art. One of them, which you have noticed, is nature and animals. Another common theme I see over the years is that I like working with light and shadows, and extremes. Sometimes I work with very vibrant colors and other times I focus on only black and white. I also make use of space as an important ingredient of a work. In art terminology I'm referring to “negative space.” I do this in my music and soundscapes as well. Silence is very important, both in tone and on a canvass or in a photograph. Creating an empty space, or conveying and expansiveness, allows the viewer or listener to focus attention and open their mind to what isn't readily perceived. Negative space is important on many levels. Without the "negative space" there would be no way to reflect upon the contrast of an object in the picture, or the notes in music. Space is also very important in the spiritual meaning as well. I'm referring to the tantric understanding of emptiness.

I view art also as a form of communication - on many different levels and experienced differently by each artist. In my art I try communicating an inseparable circulation of energy between inner and outer worlds, the dream state and the waking state, the subtle and the coarse, the ultimate and relative realities, the mystical and ordinary, the feminine and the masculine. Art is also a reflection. Whatever I create to some degree reflects what I'm experiencing or have experienced. This is also true for any works of art throughout history. You see or hear a reflection of the tone, energy or living standards within which the artist was creating. I find that fascinating. To give you an example, as I'm writing this, a neighbor is playing his radio on the street outside of my window and a piece by Johann Sebastian Bach is attracting my attention. I notice as I listen to it how much, in addition to the talent, precision and energy of the composer, there is also an aspect of a musical time-capsule involved in which the pace and way of life from the composer's time is reflected in the composition. The viewer's, or listener's, inner world is also reflected back while taking in a work of art – and that gets back to the communication element. As an artist, you are remotely communicating with people in all different times – as Johann Sebastian Bach is with me and my neighbor at the moment! I've always found it fascinating when I see how differently one piece or work can be perceived by different people. How often it happens that you perceive one mood or feeling in a work of art and someone else perceives something totally different in the same work of art. That's because your state of mind contributes to how everything is perceived, including art.

My art is also heavily inspired by dreams and mystical experiences. Those messages can be strikingly clear, with unambiguous meaning, or they can be delivered in a language of symbolism and atmosphere. All art originated as communication between the waking, spirit, and dream realms. Cave paintings, animal totem sculptures, drumming hypnotic rhythms, oracular chanting or the embodying of characters in morality plays – all of these examples of art were originally informed by mystical and oneiric experiences. Not so long ago, before our developed worlds' compulsory anthropocentric-humanist ideology, inspired art was always synonymous with magic, mysticism, animism, shamanism, divinity, religion and magic. This is what art is for me.

What is Magic for you?

First of all, thank you for spelling it correctly, and for not adding a “k” at the end of magic. I should make it clear that the word “magic” has neither a positive nor negative connotation. My book Demons of the Flesh (soon to be reprinted in a revised edition) explains in detail the origins and meaning of the word magic. To give you a brief summary, magic is a method or technique. The word stems from the ancient Greek magike tekhne or “art of the magi”. From Demons of the Flesh:

“The modern magician does well to remember the ancient concept of magic as an art, noticing as well that tekhne is the root word for 'technology.' Approaching magical praxis as a delicate balance of intuitive and aesthetic art form and logical and rational technology – at once an esoteric science and [what was once referred to as] the Black Arts – can allow for a more exacting approach to the development of the skill.”

Along these lines, one of my first Buddhist teachers told me that, to understand the complexity and discipline of Dharma practices, it was very good that I was an artist because Dharma practices are more akin to an art than religion. He suggested that possibly the best way for me to teach was through my art. That, of course, was music to my ears!

To describe what Magic is for me, it helps to provide the largely agreed upon definition of magic, cross-culturally and by many different persuasions. This excerpt from my notes at a 2009 presentation in Berlin on this subject, Magic, Media and Meditation, briefly summarizes that:

" Magic has very subjective interpretations among all the different types of practitioners. But there is a basic standard, an established commonality, which each magician accepts as the core definition. How the practitioner develops from that basis is determined by many different variables according to the different persuasions and practices of magical teachings available to each culture. The core practice of magic is: The execution of a willed intent to create change in the material world, which either defies, hastens or purifies the consequences of natural cause and effect.”

As with art, magic also is a form of communication on many obvious and subtle levels. Poor communicators have difficulty practicing magic successfully. A magician might think he's a perfectly good communicator because he talks, writes, and reads a lot. But test his communication skills with non-human beings and it becomes immediately clear whether or not he's capable of making contact with The Other. For example, those with no connection at all to animals, or who cannot even try to communicate with an animal but rather try to control it, would be poor magicians. Similarly, someone who feels silly or embarrassed trying to communicate with a non-visible entity, which is necessary to practice theurgy, invocation, prayers, spells, visualizations, and basically any kind of magic, will be a poor magician. Good communication skills, therefore, doesn't mean anyone who has a lot to say, or who continuously talks to fill gaps in conversation. On the contrary very effective magical results can come from communicating clearly but softly. Or through undisturbed emotions. Or in a language that only you and the being you're communicating with know.

There is an inherent energy to everything; constantly vibrating subtle particles that form all matter. We now know that focused, directed thoughts can change the molecular structure, quality and energy of mater. So, that requires clear communication in a focused state of mind. Considering that, you can imagine how the motivation of an artist and his or her state of mind will affect the final outcome of the work. This is true for all aspects of living and dying. Not only in creating art.

For example, if you go to a restaurant and have a meal prepared by a cook who is angry that he has to work late, impatient for his shift to be over, and resentful that he's working on a Saturday night when he'd rather be doing something else, you will be eating those toxic emotions through the food. There's a difference in the way food tastes when prepared by someone who loves you and is thinking loving thoughts into the meal (even if the food isn't perfectly prepared), compared to a similar meal at a busy food-chain prepared by a wage-slave cook. So our thoughts are very important when creating works of art. If we have a scattered, distracted, emotionally disturbed mind, it definitely manifests in the art. If we focus our motivation for what we hope to achieve in creating art, even if it's only thinking or repeating one word or phrase, that thought will carry into the artwork. The subject matter could even be unpleasant or disturbing (i.e., a war photographer or art and poetry created from experiences within repressive political regimes or violent families). If there's a compassionate motivation while working on the art, the effect of the compassionate thoughts will exist within the work, despite the possibly harsh appearance or tone of the finished work. Naturally, the reverse is also true: Art depicting pleasant subject matter created by an emotionally disturbed state of mind will also absorb and convey that energy.

So, as a magical technique, one of the most important things for any artist to remember before beginning is to be clear about the motivation. In a very small way, it's how to begin understanding magic in the context of an ongoing, never ending practice.

There is, of course, so much more to the subject of magic - too much for one interview. But that can give you a small idea of how I utilize magic in my creations.

Often in your photos your subjects are landscapes or animals, why this choice?

The simple answer is because that's what I like best. Being surrounded by animals and nature simply feels good, so why not do what makes you feel good? Which is why I live in the forest of Berlin and not in the city center. The most beautiful secret about Berlin is that it has the largest body of forestry of all the European capitals. To contrast that, consider one of the most famous films to come from Berlin, Metropolis, and its depiction of the industrialized worker-drones filing off to factory jobs. Well, that was a reflection of Berlin city life in the 1920s. But what the film depicted of how industrialized living affects the psyche is even more true today in any metropolis. City living creates a disempathic, anhedonic malaise that drains your vitality and strains the immune system. You have limited freedom of movement and space, so you confine yourself to a very selective and guarded personal space. Living packed into cities like human slaughterhouses compartmentalizes everything and fosters a desire to segregate. But in nature, boundaries are less defined. So you have a feeling of expansion rather than constriction. In Japan the Forest Agency created the idea of “forest bathing” and it's now officially recognized as a stress-management activity everywhere. I notice that whenever people come from the city center to visit me, they always comment on how much instantly better they feel just being around trees, lakes, wide open spaces and no traffic or streets. When I do portraits of people, taken in nature settings, there's a noticeable difference in the expressions. People are more at ease in nature. In city environments, under hectic and rushed conditions, people's expressions are much different. Even happy people display a subtle tension because they can't fully relax, anticipating the next interruption from whatever electronic devices - I can't work that way.

What do you think is necessary to do Art?

Patience. Self-discipline. Practice. Trust. Gratitude. A sense of humor. And what in Sanskrit is known as lila, divine creative play. A “priming of the minds canvas” is necessary. Clearing away mind-clutter in order to reach certain trance or meditative states helps you to become completely absorbed while working. If you prime yourself before beginning to work, then the art flows freely. You don't have to “think” of what to do. This expansive meditative state of mind creates a type of enthusiasm (literal meaning: an energy infusion from pure and powerful forces) which also affects the final product.

So, because of the way I work, I'm very selective about who I work with and what projects I agree to. I carefully consider the energy, ability and mental state of the people I work with because that also affects the final result of the project. In choosing an apprentice or assistant, it's very important for me to work with those of a similar temperament to maintain a cohesive and conducive atmosphere during the creation. When it comes down to the task of actually doing the work, choosing those who are undistracted, have good focus, aren't preoccupied with trivia, impatient, or waiting for the “fun” to begin, are what's important. And this is true of all inspired artists. It's a particular temperament and a way of working whereby you have a clear vision and you can only work with people who understand that way of working. In other words, I am not what I call a “congregational artist” - someone who only engages in art to feel a warm fuzzy sense of community with “like-minded people.” You may as well join the Hare Krishnas, if that's what you're looking for.

In order to create, you also need the fire in the belly. An urgent sense of time passing and impermanence. It's the knowing that if you don't seize the moment when you have it, you'll never get that shot exactly the same again; you'll never record that track exactly right without completing it...now; you'll never film that scene exactly the same way tomorrow. The fire in the belly is the sense of urgency. That there is no time to waste. That regardless of circumstances, availability of materials resources, time, financial conditions or obstacles, artists who are inspired to create have an unstoppable fire. Being truly inspired to create means you can't say you have to wait to buy a new notebook in order to write. You will either write with whatever you have or you will find a way to make one appear for you. You won't say you need to wait until you have more time to begin painting. You make the time or you sacrifice time from meaningless activities in your life. You won't say your creative juices just aren't there without the right sexual partner in your life. You will integrate your desire for the right sexual partner into your creation. Then maybe, like Pygmalion, your Galatea will actually appear in your life. You won't be an uptight geeky nerd about what materials or instruments you use, or can't do without. If you have a fire within you to create music, you will create your own instruments. If you're truly inspired, you won't even want to drink or take drugs to stimulate creativity because you'll be intoxicated by the process of creating. When you have the proper inspiration and inner fire to create, it's like a baby that's ready to be born – it can't be put off for a more optimal time to happen. It happens to you and like being in love, you can't resist it.

Have you other project in work-in-progress?

I'm working on three different projects simultaneously, involving music, writing and art. Generally, I don't talk about works in progress until they are completed or near completion. But for this interview, I've included some examples from the photography project I'm working on. Consider this interview, as well as my past, present and future work, all as fragments of my Gesamtkunstwerk, or inspired-holistic art project...A work in progress.

Zeena's artwork that goes with the interview:

Saturday, January 25, 2014

New Interview with Zeena: The Breaking of Taboo and Transgression of Social Norms in Religion and Culture - part 4


UKZN: How do you think Tantrics and Jesus would view society today?

Zeena: Well, that’s two separate things because we are talking about a group of many people [who've continued an unbroken lineage of practices to this day] and one enlightened being [born in the very distant past]. I think it would be arrogant to speak for Jesus and to try to imagine how he would see society today (laughter).

So as far as Tantrics go… well there are many different levels of perception and awareness which gradually develop. So a beginning level Tantric may view society, in perhaps a slightly negative way, like it's something to separate themselves from in order to gain better adepthood of their practices.

But maybe a more advanced Tantric would be able to experience the integration of all things without prejudice or personal agendas. He or she might see society somewhat as a manifestation of a kind of collective hallucination and not take it too seriously… maybe view it as a passing dream, which can be enjoyed as either beautiful, or horrific, or anything at all, but not taken so seriously, it's not something to be too concerned about. It is real and actually happening but it is also not real, and then it is both simultaneously, as well as neither at all.

If you consider the metaphor of dreaming, when you go to sleep at night there are issues that happen within your dreams. If you are very engaged in the dream, those issues seem very important until you wake up and then you think “Oh god, I’m glad I’m out of that dream!”.

Some people view this lifetime like a nightmare and there are a lot of people who view society as a nightmare…while others might view it as one big party or a carefree existence. But that's only one level of perception and understanding.

As a Tantric practitioner becomes more advanced, she may begin to see this society as a continuous pure land, as a paradise realm, whether within dreams, or waking states, or during personal hardships, sickness or dying…that is, when one's at a very advanced level of understanding. Because there's an understanding that all phenomena that we are experiencing right now in this lifetime is impermanent, it's transient, it's illusory, it's is both happening and it’s not happening. Therefore there is no reason to really be too concerned.

UKZN: My Guru has said “Nirvana and Samsara are One”.

Zeena: Yes, that’s from the Tibetan Buddhist Dorje Chang Thungma (lineage prayer) I practice everyday - “Samsara and nirvana inseparable; In all of [our] births may [we] never be separate from the perfect guru, enjoying dharma's splendor.” It's part of a prayer which is basically the foundation of Maha-mudra practice, passed down from the Great Vajradhara (founder of Vajrayana Buddhism), to all of the individual Maha-Siddhas (Great Accomplished Beings) - an unbroken oral transmission passed down through many generations. Its purpose is to awaken the practitioner to the realization after many years, or even lifetimes of undergoing these practices, that there is no separation at all between all things.

The preceding is an excerpt from:
An Interview with Zeena Schreck – September & October 2013
for “The Breaking of Taboo and Transgression of Social Norms in Religion and Culture Research Project by Che Chetty at the SCHOOL OF RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY AND CLASSICS UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL, SOUTH AFRICA

Monday, December 16, 2013

New Interview with Zeena: The Breaking of Taboo and Transgression of Social Norms in Religion and Culture - part 3


INTERVIEW WITH ZEENA
Part 3 - "The Breaking of Taboo and Transgression of Social Norms in Religion and Culture"

FOR THE SCHOOL OF RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY AND CLASSICS
UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL, SOUTH AFRICA

UKZN: In this study, I am trying to find the significance of taboo breaking and social norm transgression in religion and culture. Tantra and the Ministry of Jesus are being used as the primary examples to show the significance. I also wish to show how it relates to the power relations in society…not only the external power relations but the power relations within a person’s mind because as a person develops into maturity, they develop an identity and socialization takes place which creates a particular individual and that individual adheres to norms in society…what the power relations in society have instilled within them to follow and I felt that taboo breaking and social norms transgression was relevant to that.

Zeena: [Pertaining to the social norms and societal reasons:] We could start by referencing the fundamental taboos as seen within the traditional Tantric Rite of the Five M’s, (otherwise known as the ganachakra or gaṇapuja, similar to the Tibetan tshog).

Within Hindu society, that transgressive rite engages taboo foods and actions, for the purposes of transcending their grip and their hold over the mind; it involves overcoming the idea of dualism and strengthening one's yoking directly through the guru and the kaula. Growing up we live with edicts, which are either given to us by conventional religion or society (and really, in Western society, religion is not very strong; societal conventions are stronger, monetary conventions are stronger than religion). We can look to the 5 M’s for its relevance in Hindu society (perhaps not so in modern times - but maybe up until the last century), the eating of meat, the drinking of alcohol, the eating of fish, the eating of parched grain, and certain forms of sexual union, were activities which, for certain religious reasons, one was not supposed to engage in. And so by doing them, you were transgressing concepts of dualism.

Dualism is a point of reference. So when we live by edicts, when we live by dogmas and orthodoxies, no matter whether they're in the Hindu caste system or in our own caste system (we create our own caste system, every country has their own class system – it doesn’t matter what the politics is, there are certain classes that organically form) certain norms and standards of social conduct form as well. And whenever we have these norms and perceived proper standards of living, whenever we have such edicts and dogmas, then that creates a point of reference by which duality is formed. Are you this, as opposed to that? Where is your position as opposed to the other? Are you higher or lower on the pecking order?

Then once we realise the nature of cyclic existence we understand that these classes or castes are a reflection of cyclical existence; they are a reflection of the wheels that are constantly in motion, the mechanisms of society – of life itself. With the realisation that you are caught up in this cyclic existence comes an awareness. Do you really want to keep repeating yourself again and again? There's a difference between consistency of practice - which of course we have to maintain consistent practices in order to, comically enough, in order to break with the greater Samsaric existence. But maintaining consistency of one's practices is different than ignoring cyclic existence. Not everyone is even aware that they live within cyclic existence - most people are not, or they're selective about which aspects of it they wish to acknowledge. That's due to a fear of impermanence. So, when we have an awakening to the immensity of what cyclic existance really means, you think, “Oh my god, there's something wrong here!” That awakening can come in any form. It can manifest in any way. Some people feel that they are stuck in a rut, like a cog in a wheel - their daily routine, and nothing is changing - and yet, that is in its very nature, a part of cyclic existence; that you are on “autopilot” and just going along with what’s happening.

So, the breaking of taboos...however the individual conceives of that for their given situation (everybody’s life situation is different, everybody's environment and culture is different) whatever your culture, or environment and your life situation is, you can use this concept of the 5 M’s as an example of how one might break taboos in his or her own environment. But it's nearly impossible to have the clarity of mind and self-awareness to be able to accurately know where all of your own weak points are, which need overcoming. That gets back to why you need someone who's qualified and trustworthy to guide your spiritual progress, and to confront you with your own sacred cows.

So, why do Tantrics break taboos? For what purpose? Well, for a person who embarks on that path it could be because we realise that we have been living our life on ‘autopilot’, regardless of how interesting, or not, our life might have seemed. We realise that living a life on autopilot filled with seemingly meaningful distractions, isn’t the true meaning of life; that that isn’t our purpose for being here. So the breaking of taboos is not just to be a provocateur or reactionary, or to be the weirdest guest at a party, or to express your individuality. The breaking of taboos is an urgent, inner burning need to understand what our purpose is here…that's the first level. Then beyond that it's an internal process of coninuing awakening. For the practitioner it's to create internal transformation by challenging ingrained fears, worries, dogmas, orthodoxies, etc.. Then beyond even that, there are deeper, more complicated reasons for the breaking of taboos which can only be discussed with your guru.

By taking the first steps of breaking your patterns and habits, of breaking your own dogmas and orthodoxies, of breaking your familiar conditions, you create internal transformations which will enable you to begin seeing reality more clearly, without concepts, narratives or filters...and it will ultimately hasten your way toward total release of all the suffering, and causes of suffering that come of cyclic existence.

[...to be continued...]


The preceding is an excerpt from:
An Interview with Zeena Schreck – September & October 2013
for “The Breaking of Taboo and Transgression of Social Norms in Religion and Culture”

A Research Project by Che Chetty at the
SCHOOL OF RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY AND CLASSICS
UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL, SOUTH AFRICA

Saturday, December 14, 2013

New Interview with Zeena: The Breaking of Taboo and Transgression of Social Norms in Religion and Culture - part 2


INTERVIEW WITH ZEENA
Part 2 - "The Breaking of Taboo and Transgression of Social Norms in Religion and Culture"

FOR THE SCHOOL OF RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY AND CLASSICS
UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL, SOUTH AFRICA

UKZN: Do you think academics understand Tantra or will ever be able to do so?


Zeena: Without a basis in practice you cannot really know what you are talking about because only through practice comes actual realisation of these philosophies and teachings. Academic texts by their very nature are the opposite of Tantra in action. Tantra is an action based practice. So your questions is, “Do you think academics understand Tantra or will ever be able to do so?” My answer would have to be…not completely. I don’t think they ever could fully understand Tantra.


Firstly, because of the very way, in order to be an academic, a person has to be. By being an academic you have claimed and stated (by default of the profession) that you are going to be objective, that you are not going to (get your hands dirty). So as an academic, you cannot relinquish your position and hierarchy within the field of academics…so you cannot possibly understand it fully. Because until you can actually engage in the practices there is no way to fully understand why Tantrics do what they do. So academics will always be from the outside looking in and that is not an accurate reportage. Academics would have to lose their position in whichever university they work for. They would have to relinquish that identity in order to fully understand Tantra.

UKZN: I do know that with some academics, that when they go into a certain field of study, there is acknowledgment (and caution) that they might get influenced.


Zeena: Right. That’s why it is an absurd idea that you should not allow yourself to be influenced. Because how can you adequately speak on what is happening? How can you adequately explain whatever it is that you are reporting on? So that is why I have an issue with academics. Academics are somewhat fearful people; people who are fearful to let go and that’s true not just within religious academics, but in academics of all kinds whether they are scientific academics or research academics, etc.. The reason why they are in that position is because they are more cerebrally oriented and it’s a means of hanging onto their ego, hanging onto to feeling like they are keeping a grip on their rationality and sanity, that they are keeping a grip on their mind. But in fact, what they need to do, to have better understanding, is lose that grip. Because you have to be fully engaged in these practices to understand them, I would say an academic could not fully understand Tantra for that reason.


Now academia is perfectly fine for documentation, and documentation is important. It’s very useful and very necessary. So I am not disregarding it on that level. It’s very important for there to be documented accounts of such things but they can’t entirely be representative from the practitioner's perspective. And so in keeping with the idea that nothing is inherently wrong (again, the question was whether an academic could fully understand these things), I am not saying academics are “bad” or “wrong.” I am saying they serve a good purpose - but it’s limited.

My issue with academics is when they take a kind of position of superiority to these things as if by maintaining their distance they are keeping their sanity and just observing some strange cultural or anthropological phenomena. And in doing so they're being somewhat condescending about it. And that's really hilarious because by maintaining that position, their own limitations show.

[...to be continued...]

The preceding is an excerpt from:
An Interview with Zeena Schreck – September & October 2013
for “The Breaking of Taboo and Transgression of Social Norms in Religion and Culture”

A Research Project by Che Chetty at the
SCHOOL OF RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY AND CLASSICS
UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL, SOUTH AFRICA

Thursday, December 12, 2013

New Interview with Zeena: The Breaking of Taboo and Transgression of Social Norms in Religion and Culture - part 1


NEW INTERVIEW WITH ZEENA
Part 1 - "The Breaking of Taboo and Transgression of Social Norms in Religion and Culture"

FOR THE SCHOOL OF RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY AND CLASSICS
UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL, SOUTH AFRICA


UKZN: Tantrics have been known to break taboos and transgress social norms. Is this true, and if so what are these taboos and social norms? And why?


Zeena: It depends on what kind of a Tantric you are, because there are different kinds of Tantrics. So yes, there are Tantrics who deliberately break taboos and social norms and then there are other Tantrics who, by means of their practices and the way that they practice, that to society in general, it may have the appearance of breaking social norms but in fact that is just the manifestation of the progress of their practice. Do you understand what I mean by that?

UKZN: It depends on the Tantric or the individual?


Zeena: Well, there are Tantrics who deliberately seek to do more active forms of renunciation, so transgression of social norms and breaking of taboo, and breaking of social taboos especially, is a form of renunciation.


UKZN: There are many lineages and different traditions in Tantra, and so it becomes difficult to pinpoint who does what. But what would you say is a unifying factor that makes something Tantric?


Zeena: A unifying factor is that it is feminine in nature. It acknowledges the feminine as the basis from which all the practices spring. Therefore, Tantra is by its nature, the understanding that all phenomenal existence, the universe, or cosmos, that we experience is feminine in nature. Do you know what the feminine and masculine principles represent?

UKZN: Are you referring to something like “yin-yang”?

Zeena: Yes, like that. First of all there are different energies, and also there are different principles in understanding. So the feminine principle is all that which is made manifest; the unmanifest made manifest.


UKZN: The world of the flesh?


Zeena: Not only the world of the flesh, but the world of your table, the world of your car…the phenomenal world. The material world is all feminine. It is making the non-manifest, manifest. So even men (are of the feminine energy). We have to relinquish our ideas of gender in the conventional sense. This has nothing to do with gender, it has to do with energy. So feminine energy is what creates and allows anything which is non-manifest, like an idea, to come into form, into being, to be born. So all that we experience in the world around us, absolutely everything (is feminine energy). The only way that it exists is through the feminine force.


Now what is the masculine force? That is what is not manifest. That is the area of non-manifest awareness, understanding, ideas and things like that. You can’t bind them, touch them, or move them because they are non-manifest. So in order for me to answer these questions succinctly, you must have good basis of understanding of what these laws are. They are like laws of gravity or they are like laws of electricity or they are like laws of understanding.


In Tantric Buddhism we have certain laws of understanding. They have been proven to exist and it is the same whether in ancient Indian Tantric understanding or contemporary understanding. So these are principles, these are laws, which exist and which are irrefutable. But if you don’t yet know that basis, by which Tantra operates, you will still be thinking in this kind of distorted, Western idea of Tantra.

So, let's see how we can get to these questions in a more succinct and focused way…because, you know, the breaking of taboos is not just to be reactionary to society. Its not like that. The breaking of taboos and these practices is because in order for one to reach realisation…well first, do you even understand what liberation and enlightenment actually is?

UKZN: Freedom from delusion? Restraints?


Zeena: Okay. To understand why one chooses to be a Tantric practitioner (maybe that is the core question in and of itself) there has to be an understanding of cause and effect, cyclic existence, the awareness that the reality that we think we are seeing is not reality as it really truly is. So enlightenment is seeing reality with bare awareness, non-conceptual reality.

[...to be continued in NOTES...]

The preceding is an excerpt from:
An Interview with Zeena Schreck – September & October 2013 for "The Breaking of Taboo and Transgression of Social Norms in Religion and Culture"

A Research Project by Che Chetty at the
SCHOOL OF RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY AND CLASSICS
UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL, SOUTH AFRICA

Monday, November 25, 2013

RAVE REVIEW FOR ZEENA'S NEW YORK PERFORMANCE FROM BUSHWICK DAILY!


Full Review:

Excerpted Review:
"The Performa 13 event Frank Haines presents Zeena Schreck: Live from the Eye of the Storm was a must-see. The November 8th one-night-only event did not disappoint [...] Jingling bells and padded footsteps echoed in the darkness. The curtains silently parted, dramatically revealing an electrified, vermilion environment. Dead center, with hands held in the Mudra position, stood the seemingly twenty-foot tall goddess Zeena. With a painted gong behind her, Bharoocha and Hermund adorned her sides. Bharoocha lit incense that swept through the audience as Zeena’s commanding gaze pierced us all (everyone I talked to after the show swore she was staring directly at them) [...] Zeena towered over us in a powerful, haute couture black vestment designed by Ohne Titel. [...] Seamlessly, a sound and voice collage emerged from the trio. Zeena began by activating a large singing bowl. As she began to chant in an unidentifiable language, musicians Bharoocha and Hermund masterfully maintained the rhythm. With Hermund staring straight ahead and Bharoocha’s eyes closed, both seemed deep in trance. The healing process of sound and vibration washed over me and I relaxed into the spellbinding show. What initially seemed like songs, I learned was a series of mantras. Each psalm mandated a new combination of auxiliary percussion instruments. I’ve never heard so many different types used in a single performance–mesmerized the congregation [...] The entire ritual lasted approximately 45 minutes and I left with a bewildering calm, peace, and awe [...] As for seeing Zeena again, the notion strikes that this was a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence. I must let whatever vibrations I absorbed from the High Priestess feed me for as long as possible.''

Saturday, November 23, 2013

LIE: NIKOLAS EXPOSES ROLLING STONE'S LATEST ''JOURNALISM''


Posted by admin at Nikolas's request.

"As many of you know, the worldwide mass media are having a field day with the shallow and salacious "Is Charles Manson Getting Married?" stupidity featured in this week's EXTREMELY deceptive profile on Charles Manson by "journalist" Erik Hedegaard. I find it particularly irresponsible that Hedegaard exploited Star's trusting generosity to him and wrongly characterized her as a Susan Atkins lookalike and potential murderer, which is malicious nonsense the media is now spreading to its constituency of idiots.

Mr. Hedegaard interviewed me in Los Angeles last year after ordering The Manson File: Myth and Reality of an Outlaw Shaman. He told me in elaborate credible detail that Rolling Stone had specifically assigned him to expose Bugliosi's lies in Helter Skelter. He asked me for leads and areas to investigate, and I provided them to him in depth. Manson himself was (correctly) sceptical about Hedegaard's good intentions, but based on the the writer's proposal to 'expose Bugliosi's lies' (concealing his true intentions), I suggested to Manson that he should meet him, which I now regret.

Another associate of mine was present during Hedegaard's meeting with Manson. This person immediately saw that Hedegaard was pursuing the same old crap journalists always spew on this subject and was not at all fulfilling the promises he made to those of us he used to make contact with Manson. He confronted Hedegaard on his hypocrisy and not surprisingly, none of this was mentioned in the cowardly and evasive article that appeared.

I will speak further on the subject of the media's deceptive tactics in a forthcoming interview TBA soon, but thought that those of you who read the Rolling Stone feature should be informed of its unreliability. NS"
Related Posts with Thumbnails